Skip to main content
EN/FR/ES/DE interface · every recommendation checked against your business rules

Solutions · Financial

Allocate capital with limits, risk and priorities in view.

Compare portfolios, budgets, treasury choices and investment plans without hiding the constraints or presenting model output as financial advice.

100 units at a time, $400 a year — and anything from 87 to 115 is within one percent.

Demo data

$20 an order: 100 units at a time, $400 a year

The answer

100units at a time

Orders a year
10
Ordering
$200
Holding
$200
Total a year
$400

Ordering and holding come out equal, which is exactly what being at the cheapest order size means here — spend a little more on one and you spend more overall.

Ordering 250 four times a year would cost $580 $180 more.

How much precision is worth

Order sizes across the band that costs within one percent of the cheapest, with the yearly total for each and how much more it is than the cheapest.
OrderTotal a yearExtra
87$404+$4
94$401+$1
100$400 — the cheapest best
108$401+$1
115$404+$4

Anything from 87 to 115 costs within one percent of the best. So round to whatever your supplier ships in. The number worth your attention is the handling cost — change that and the answer moves properly.

Checks

  • Passed: Ordering and holding priced per the brief
  • Passed: Every order size 1–1,000 priced
  • Passed: Cheapest size kept

What this brief supplied

Yearly demand
1,000 units
Handling
A cost for every order placed
Holding
4 a unit per year
Lead time
Not stated — not stated in this brief. How long an order takes to arrive decides when to reorder, not how much. This answer is a quantity, not a reorder point.
Demand variability
Not stated — not stated in this brief. Demand is treated as steady across the year. Real variation is what safety stock exists for, and none is sized here.
Quantity discounts
Not stated — not stated in this brief. The unit price is treated as flat. A price break at a larger order would move the answer toward that break.
Storage limit
Not stated — not stated in this brief. No cap on what will fit was given. A shelf that holds less than the recommended order would rule it out regardless of cost.

What you can decide

Money decisions, end to end

Budget allocation

Spread a fixed budget across competing initiatives and see the return trade against the risk.

Portfolio construction

Weights under exposure caps and concentration limits, with the variance made visible.

Risk and credit

Limits, provisions, and credit decisions expressed as rules the answer must respect.

Revenue and treasury

Pricing tiers, cash positioning, and funding schedules solved against your calendar.

The frontier, not a hunch

Hairline curves are the candidate plans; the teal line is the frontier where nothing improves without something else giving. Recommendations come from there.

How it runs

Numbers in, defensible numbers out

01

Set the envelope

The budget, the caps, the floors, and what a good outcome means — stated plainly.

02

Get the split

An allocation with expected impact, confidence, and the binding limits called out.

03

Take it to the meeting

Stakeholder and data formats, built from the same saved recommendation.